How to Report Scientific Findings

This online resource from SciDev.Net is written as a communication guide for journalists reporting scientific research. It explains how and why to interrogate research findings that might appear in press releases. Stories lacking depth and investigation are called "churnalism", reporting that allows exaggerated claims to reach the public. Instead, the authors emphasise responsible journalism through the following sections:

1. "Start with the press release
2. Reading the research paper
3. Enrich the story
4. Be responsible in reporting
5. Final check list
6. Useful links"

Each section contains details on journalistic processes and tips for story production. For example, under "Start with the press release", the list includes: check for hyperbole, check for context or lack thereof, don't be misled, and check image rights.

The final checklist gives a quick way to review articles written using this reporting guide:

• "What was the primary finding?
• Who was involved? Who does it affect? Where did it take place?
• Why does it matter? Why now?
• How was the research conducted? Was there anything special about this? Any limitations?
• Where does this sit in the bigger picture?
• Have you spoken to a good range of people about it (including non-experts)?
• Have you gone beyond the press release and interrogated the findings thoroughly?
• Have you tailored the story to your audience?
• Have you considered angles that others may have missed?
• Were there any conflicts of interest, for example in the way the work was funded?
• Have you reported responsibly, giving an accurate depiction of the findings?
• Where did you find your story? Include bibliographical details if possible. "