Media development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

What Are the Roles and Responsibilities of the Media in Disseminating Health?

0 comments
Affiliation
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Summary

PLoS Medicine asked health journalists and others interested in
media reporting of health to share their opinions on the roles and responsibilities of the media
in disseminating health information. This article contains a series of short opinion pieces by
respondents, addressing issues including reporting accuracy, research bias, and
the different roles of journalists and the media industry. 

  • Gary Schwitzer argues that it isn't enough to be accurate and clear, but that journalists need
    to "mirror a society's needs and issues, comprehensively and proportionally."
    Schwitzer expresses particular concern for television journalism, where a 45-second news story may need to be balanced against "many more one-sided political ads about health policy ".
  • Ganapati Mudur believes that health journalists need to place a story in context, citing prior
    research; providing analysis and interpretation; and
    verifying funding sources behind the research.
  • David Henry and Amanda Wilson focus on quality of reporting, emphasising the importance of independent
    information sources, and of accurately reporting the benefits, harms, and costs of a treatment.
  • Merrill Goozner suggests that medical reporters need to move beyond reporting of hyped-up "breakthroughs" to report
    realistic news that reflects the underlying conflicts of interest in a story.
  • Maria Simbra recommends continuing education as a way for reporters to gain the necessary understanding of the science behind a medical story.
  • Melissa Sweet suggests focussing on the competitive economics of the media industry rather than journalists themselves.
    The media industry, she argues, is focussed on attracting affluent professionals, an approach that biases the stories selected for broadcast.
  • Katherine A. Baverstock questions whether it is appropriate for journalists
    to take on a role as health educators. She suggests, rather,
    that they should "play a special role in providing a voice for people to express their experiences
    of illness and their interactions with the technologies of health."