Media development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Situational Analysis on SRH/HIV Integration in Zambia

0 comments
Date
Summary

This 34-page report shares findings from a study to better understand the situation related to integrating HIV and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programming in Zambia. The assessment found that there is some integration of RH and HIV services in Zambia, particularly at public health facilities, and especially within antenatal and post-natal care services, male circumcision services, and family planning services. However, challenges remain as health workers find their workloads increasing in scope, and some facilities struggle with stockouts. Coordination is identified as a key challenge, and there is a need for increased advocacy to encourage integration.

The report is based on a 15-day rapid situation assessment commissioned by SAfAIDS and Youth Vision Zambia, in partnership with Population Action International. The goal of the assessment was to better understand current policies and practices, as well as identify opportunities for advocacy. Integration is considered beneficial, as this allows people to conveniently access services in one place and maximises institutional resources. It also promotes greater response to the reproductive health needs of people living with HIV and other marginalised groups.

The report notes that information on family planning is widely available - "97% of all women and 98.8% of currently married women know at least one contraceptive method. 99% of all men and 99.8% of married men know any contraceptive method. This knowledge is relatively equal both in rural areas as well as in urban areas with 99.8% in urban areas compared to 98.4% in rural areas. People are more knowledgeable about modern family planning methods than they are about traditional methods. Condoms are the commonly mentioned contraceptive followed by pills and then injectables."

Likewise, services are available although more so in urban than rural areas. Yet, "[o]verall, current uptake and use of family planning is low and estimated at 30% which means 70% of women are not using any form of contraceptives. This is significantly lower than neighbouring countries such as Zimbabwe with 58.4% and Swaziland with 47.7%." The low uptake is attributed mostly to traditional beliefs and widespread stock outs of supplies, though it is noted that some respondents indicated that there is less emphasis on family planning, and currently more focus on HIV/AIDS. One respondent stated, “You know in the 1990s everywhere you went you saw a poster, there were lots of radio programmes and community discussions on family planning. Nowadays you rarely see that." Lack of male involvement and poor services for adolescents are also identified as key gaps.

In terms of programming, the report identifies a number of strategic advocacy entry points:

  • Creation of Civil Society Coalition for RH and HIV integration: There is a need to bring civil society together to sensitise and create awareness about integration and to build a buy-in coalition of NGOs. "This effort will not only make the RH and HIV integration agenda prominent in CSOs but will also begin to influence possible allocation of resources in a manner that programmes become more horizontal in nature rather than so vertical and independent from each other."
  • Coordination between NAC and MoH: There should be better collaboration between The Ministry of Health (MOH) Reproductive Health Unit and the National AIDS Council (NAC), so that the two institutions can work in collaboration to develop RH and HIV integration programmes.
  • Male and Adolescent Reproductive Health: Most RH and HIV integration programmes focus on women and children. There is a need to better understand and address male and adolescent reproductive health.
  • Creation of an Integration Technical Working Group under the auspices of the Ministry of Health: Such a working group could provide guidance in integration, develop relevant policies, and develop guidelines and strategies for health facilities and CSOS. Such a technical working group should work very closely with other key stakeholders particularly the NAC.