Media development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

The Role of Supportive Supervision Using Mobile Technology in Monitoring and Guiding Program Performance: A Case Study in Nigeria, 2015-2016

0 comments
Affiliation

World Health Organization (WHO) Country Office, Abuja (Tegegne, Braka, Erbeto, Aregay, Rasheed, Alpha, Khedr, Isameldin, Yehushualet, Warigon, Alemu); National Primary Health Care Development Agency, or NPHCDA (Shuaib, Adamu, Damisa, Okposen); WHO Regional Office for Africa (Mkanda, Ubong); Global Public Health Care Solutions (Nsubuga); WHO Headquarters (Vaz)

Date
Summary

"Supervision using mobile technology has contributed to producing real-time data."

The importance of supportive supervision in public health has been linked with improvements in programme performance. The added advantage of using mobile phones for collecting data during health facility supervision is the availability of the global positioning system (GPS) within current generation mobile phones or smartphones. Using GPS information, it is possible to obtain approximate distances between healthcare facilities, which could inform proper health service provision. However, there is little evidence on technology-assisted mobile data collection for real-time data transfer during supportive supervision. Thus, the authors set out to determine the contribution of supportive supervision using mobile technology in providing timely programme information in the polio programme in Nigeria.

Specifically, they analysed supportive supervision findings collected by mobile phones under the open data kit (ODK) platform from July 2015 to June 2016. ODK is a free and open-source set of tools that provides an out-of-the-box solution for users to build a data collection form or survey, collect the data on a mobile device, send it to a server, aggregate the collected data on a server, and extract it in useful formats. Supervision was conducted across the country by 592 WHO officers. All officers were provided with mobile phones and given access to download a form for use during supervision of health facilities. To understand how to use this technology, they were provided with hands-on training; data managers in the 6 geopolitical zones of the country were trained to assist in the process, including to help with troubleshooting. At the end of each supervisory visit, the officers sent the data to a centrally managed server. The system replaced a paper-based data collection method.

A total of 90,396 facilities were supervised at least once during the study period from July 2015 to June 2016. In short, the study found that supportive supervision, using a handheld mobile data collection tool, was performed on average in 199 minutes and transferred to a central-level server within 5 hours from more than 6,000 health facilities across the country. The evidence suggests that real-time data were available for action at the national and zonal levels on the same day that supervision took place in health facilities. Programme officers used the findings to rectify process indicators in time for a better outcome.

As shown in Figure 1 in the paper, acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) cases were detected in health facilities that benefited from supportive supervision during the study period. The only opportunity for the health workers in those facilities was sensitisation during supportive supervision. Of the total 6,544 AFP cases detected during the study period, 1,778 were in health facilities by focal persons that were not formally trained but were supervised.

In conclusion, the system has been used to locate the actual location of facilities and the distance of a health facility from a given point. This helps to give timely feedback and plan health interventions properly. According to the authors, the system of using mobile phones could be used to monitor programme implementation for other health interventions, such as defaulter tracing in routine immunisation, the sending of alerts for outbreak-prone diseases, investigation of outbreaks, and supervision of any other health interventions.

Source

BMC Public Health 2018 18 (Suppl 4): 1317. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6189-8. Image credit: Constant Dedo