Media development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Koul, P. B., Murali, M. V., Gupta, P., & Sharma, P. P. (1991). Evaluation of social marketing of oral rehydration therapy

0 comments

Koul, P. B., Murali, M. V., Gupta, P., & Sharma, P. P. (1991). Evaluation of social marketing of oral rehydration therapy. Indian Pediatrics, 28(9), 1013-1016.

Abstract

Evaluation of social marketing of oral rehydration therapy.

Researchers interviewed 149 mothers from the slums of East Delhi, India whoknew about oral rehydration therapy (ORT) to evaluate the effectiveness of the Ministry of Health's massmedia campaign to promote ORT use during diarrheal episodes. As of September 1991, India has distributedoral rehydration solution (ORS) packets free of charge. The Ministry of Health has conducted the campaignsince 1989. They compared the 59 mothers who watched the television (TV) ads with celebrities deliveringsimple and clear images to the 90 mothers who had received ORT messages from other sources such as healthworkers. Mothers who watched the TV ads were considerably more likely to know how to correctly prepareORS than those who learned about ORT from other sources (62.7% vs. 37.7%; p.01). No significant differencein use of ORT at home between the 2 groups existed, however (69.49% and 53.33%, respectively). Yet whenthe mothers were divided by educational status, they learned that TV ads were more likely to teach educatedmothers how to correctly prepare and to use ORT at home than health staff (81.5% vs. 35.5% and 81.5%vs. 41.9%, respectively; p.01). Most mothers (88.13% and 81.11%, respectively) in both groups still fedtheir child during diarrheal episodes. TV ads and health staff were equally effective for both educatedand uneducated women. These results showed that social marketing of ORS packets via the TV ads was successfulin increasing ORT acceptability, knowledge, use, and especially among educated mothers. Similar studiesin Bangladesh showed that education incites changes in attitude and behavior of mothers which makes themmore receptive of new knowledge and modern medicine. Another possibility for the education differencemay be that TV was better able to interest educated mothers than health staff.