Communication for Social Change
presented at the IDB Forum
This presentation made the case that we now have many different models of communication for social change. It suggested that the battles between social marketing, participation, advocacy and social mobilization should give way to a more sophisticated analysis of the problem and the kind of tool - and often the combination of tools - needed to address it. Successes in oral rehydration, AIDS, family planning, seat belt use and SIDS were compared with failures such as obesity and exercise and disappointing results from two decades work on AIDS in Africa. Smith described the use of mass communication to incite conversation in communities; the use of computer models to influence policy change; as well as examples of e-government, school networking and sustaining Maya culture using the internet. Examples were tied together with brief overviews of social movement theory, risk communication and communication to support law enforcement. The basic take away message was - we need to stop pitting marketing against mobilization and participation against advocacy. It's a complicated world and we need to get smarter about all the alternatives for real social change.
![]()





Blame cigarette makers.
Big Success
Tobacco
Heart Disease
AIDS in the United States/Switzerland
Family Planning
Child Survival
Seat Belts
SIDS
Big Failures
AIDS in Africa
Obesity & Exercise in United States
New Starts
Civic Participation
E-Technology Networking
Building Social Capitol


Communication for Public Talk

Communication for Policy Change
Profiles:
Bangladesh
Ghana
Togo
Philippines
China
India
plus 16 more countries

EcuadorJamaica
Guatemala
Brazil
Chile
E-government
School Networking
Online Learning
Mayan Culture
NGO Sustainability
Communication to build Civil Society


Advocacy Communication

Communication for Enforcement Support

Risk Communication
Confirmation Bias:
- New data - make it fit
- Contrary data - filter out
- Ambiguous data - simplify it
- Consistent data - proof positive
NEW THEORY
Social Capital
Community Environment is a big predictor of Readiness to change

Definitions and Measures
Community Efficacy: Shared Expectation for Collective Action given a Problem.
Cohesion
Trust
Networks
Norms

Readiness Mapping

More Options - More Evidence - More Experience
Risk Communication
Advocacy Communication
Communication for Policy Change
Communication for Public Talk
Communication for Enforcement
Communication for Behavior Change
Communication to Build Civil Society
Click here to download a PDF version of this document.
- Log in to post comments











































